Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
The Medical Journal of Malaysia ; : 138-144, 2021.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-877174

ABSTRACT

@#Introduction: Healthcare workers serve as the frontliners against the coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) and this puts them most at risk of infection as they attend to numerous patients with unknown status. This study aimed to examine stress, anxiety, and depression among healthcare workers caring for COVID-19 patients in Sarawak General Hospital (SGH), Malaysia. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional observational study conducted in SGH during the pandemic with an online self-administered questionnaire composed of two parts, the socio-demographic characteristics, and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS). Results: A total of 105 healthcare workers responded to this study. A questionnaire in both Bahasa Melayu and English was used. The findings showed that all healthcare workers had mild anxiety, with the majority experiencing mild stress (57.1%), and almost half of the respondents experiencing mild depression (41%). Female subjects had a significant higher mean score in anxiety level and stress level compared to male subjects (10.0±3.20 vs. 8.6±2.93, p<0.05; 14.1±4.76 vs. 10.7±3.70, p<0.05, respectively). Staff who were transferred from other units to handle COVID-19 cases experienced more psychological symptoms. There were significant correlations between the depression, anxiety and stress levels among the healthcare workers and the number of children they had (r=0.739, p=0.001; r=0.642, p=0.001; r=1, p =0.001 respectively). However, the stress level among the healthcare workers was reversely correlated with their years of working experience (r=-0.199, p=0.042). Conclusion: This study identified some socio-demographic factors associated with increased levels of stress, anxiety and depression among the healthcare workers during pandemic, which may lay ground for future interventions.

2.
The Medical Journal of Malaysia ; : 499-503, 2019.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-825283

ABSTRACT

@#Introduction: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the commonest median nerve entrapment neuropathy of the hand, up to 90% of all nerve compression syndromes. The disease is often treated with conservative measures or surgery. The senior author initially intended to treat his own neurosurgical patients concurrently diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome in 2014, subsequently, he began to pick up more referrals from the primary healthcare group over the years. This has led to the setup of a peripheral and spine clinic to act as a hub of referrals. Objective: Department of Neurosurgery Sarawak aimed to evaluate the surgical outcome of carpal tunnel release done over five years. Methods: The carpal tunnel surgeries were done under local anaesthesia (LA) given by neurosurgeons (Bupivacaine 0.5% or Lignocaine 2%). Monitored anaesthesia care (MAC) was later introduced by our hospital neuroanaesthetist in the beginning of 2018 (Target-controlled infusion propofol and boluses of fentanyl). We looked into our first 17 cases and compared these to the two anaesthesia techniques (LA versus MAC + LA) in terms of patient’s pain score based on visual analogue scale (VAS). Results: Result showed MAC provided excellent pain control during and immediately after the surgery. None experienced anaesthesia complications. There was no difference in pain control at post-operation one month. Both techniques had equal good clinical outcome during patients’ clinic follow up. Conclusion: Neurosurgeons provide alternative route for CTS patients to receive surgical treatment. Being a designated pain free hospital, anaesthetist collaboration in carpal tunnel surgery is an added value and improves patients overall experience and satisfaction.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL